Gemma 2 9B vs Phi-3 Medium
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Gemma 2 9B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters9B
KYI Score7.9/10
LicenseGemma License
Phi-3 Medium
ProviderMicrosoft
Parameters14B
KYI Score8.3/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 2 9B | Phi-3 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Parameters | 9B | 14B |
| KYI Score | 7.9/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Speed | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Quality | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| License | Gemma License | MIT |
| Context Length | 8K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Gemma 2 9B9/10
Phi-3 Medium9/10
QualityHigher is better
Gemma 2 9B7/10
Phi-3 Medium7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Gemma 2 9B10/10
Phi-3 Medium10/10
Gemma 2 9B Strengths
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Fast
- ✓Good for size
- ✓Google backing
Gemma 2 9B Limitations
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Shorter context
- ✗Limited capabilities
Phi-3 Medium Strengths
- ✓Excellent efficiency
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
- ✓Fast
Phi-3 Medium Limitations
- ✗Lower quality than larger models
- ✗Limited capabilities
Best Use Cases
Gemma 2 9B
ChatbotsContent generationEdge deploymentGeneral tasks
Phi-3 Medium
Edge deploymentMobile appsChatbotsCode assistance
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Gemma 2 9B if you need efficient and prioritize fast.
Choose Phi-3 Medium if you need excellent efficiency and prioritize mit license.