Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen 2.5 72B
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Mixtral 8x7B
ProviderMistral AI
Parameters46.7B (8x7B MoE)
KYI Score8.7/10
LicenseApache 2.0
Qwen 2.5 72B
ProviderAlibaba Cloud
Parameters72B
KYI Score8.9/10
LicenseApache 2.0
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Mixtral 8x7B | Qwen 2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba Cloud |
| Parameters | 46.7B (8x7B MoE) | 72B |
| KYI Score | 8.7/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Speed | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Quality | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Apache 2.0 |
| Context Length | 32K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Mixtral 8x7B8/10
Qwen 2.5 72B7/10
QualityHigher is better
Mixtral 8x7B8/10
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Mixtral 8x7B9/10
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
Mixtral 8x7B Strengths
- ✓Excellent speed-quality balance
- ✓Efficient architecture
- ✓Strong multilingual
- ✓Apache 2.0 license
Mixtral 8x7B Limitations
- ✗Smaller context than LLaMA 3.1
- ✗Complex architecture
Qwen 2.5 72B Strengths
- ✓Best-in-class Chinese support
- ✓Strong multilingual
- ✓Long context
- ✓Versatile
Qwen 2.5 72B Limitations
- ✗Less known in Western markets
- ✗Documentation primarily in Chinese
Best Use Cases
Mixtral 8x7B
Code generationMultilingual tasksReasoningContent creation
Qwen 2.5 72B
Multilingual applicationsAsian language tasksCode generationTranslation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Mixtral 8x7B if you need excellent speed-quality balance and prioritize efficient architecture.
Choose Qwen 2.5 72B if you need best-in-class chinese support and prioritize strong multilingual.