Phi-3 Medium vs DeepSeek Coder V2
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Phi-3 Medium
ProviderMicrosoft
Parameters14B
KYI Score8.3/10
LicenseMIT
DeepSeek Coder V2
ProviderDeepSeek
Parameters236B (MoE)
KYI Score9.1/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Phi-3 Medium | DeepSeek Coder V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | 14B | 236B (MoE) |
| KYI Score | 8.3/10 | 9.1/10 |
| Speed | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Quality | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Phi-3 Medium9/10
DeepSeek Coder V27/10
QualityHigher is better
Phi-3 Medium7/10
DeepSeek Coder V29/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Phi-3 Medium10/10
DeepSeek Coder V28/10
Phi-3 Medium Strengths
- ✓Excellent efficiency
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
- ✓Fast
Phi-3 Medium Limitations
- ✗Lower quality than larger models
- ✗Limited capabilities
DeepSeek Coder V2 Strengths
- ✓Exceptional coding
- ✓Massive language support
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
DeepSeek Coder V2 Limitations
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Specialized for code
Best Use Cases
Phi-3 Medium
Edge deploymentMobile appsChatbotsCode assistance
DeepSeek Coder V2
Code generationCode completionDebuggingCode translation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Phi-3 Medium if you need excellent efficiency and prioritize mit license.
Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you need exceptional coding and prioritize massive language support.