Qwen 2.5 72B vs DeepSeek Coder V2
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Qwen 2.5 72B
ProviderAlibaba Cloud
Parameters72B
KYI Score8.9/10
LicenseApache 2.0
DeepSeek Coder V2
ProviderDeepSeek
Parameters236B (MoE)
KYI Score9.1/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 72B | DeepSeek Coder V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba Cloud | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | 72B | 236B (MoE) |
| KYI Score | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 |
| Speed | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| Quality | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| License | Apache 2.0 | MIT |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B7/10
DeepSeek Coder V27/10
QualityHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
DeepSeek Coder V29/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
DeepSeek Coder V28/10
Qwen 2.5 72B Strengths
- ✓Best-in-class Chinese support
- ✓Strong multilingual
- ✓Long context
- ✓Versatile
Qwen 2.5 72B Limitations
- ✗Less known in Western markets
- ✗Documentation primarily in Chinese
DeepSeek Coder V2 Strengths
- ✓Exceptional coding
- ✓Massive language support
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
DeepSeek Coder V2 Limitations
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Specialized for code
Best Use Cases
Qwen 2.5 72B
Multilingual applicationsAsian language tasksCode generationTranslation
DeepSeek Coder V2
Code generationCode completionDebuggingCode translation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Qwen 2.5 72B if you need best-in-class chinese support and prioritize strong multilingual.
Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you need exceptional coding and prioritize massive language support.