StarCoder 2 vs DeepSeek Coder V2
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
StarCoder 2
ProviderBigCode
Parameters15B
KYI Score8.4/10
LicenseBigCode OpenRAIL-M
DeepSeek Coder V2
ProviderDeepSeek
Parameters236B (MoE)
KYI Score9.1/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | StarCoder 2 | DeepSeek Coder V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | BigCode | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | 15B | 236B (MoE) |
| KYI Score | 8.4/10 | 9.1/10 |
| Speed | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Quality | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| License | BigCode OpenRAIL-M | MIT |
| Context Length | 16K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
StarCoder 28/10
DeepSeek Coder V27/10
QualityHigher is better
StarCoder 28/10
DeepSeek Coder V29/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
StarCoder 29/10
DeepSeek Coder V28/10
StarCoder 2 Strengths
- ✓Massive language support
- ✓Good performance
- ✓Open license
StarCoder 2 Limitations
- ✗Surpassed by newer models
- ✗Medium size
DeepSeek Coder V2 Strengths
- ✓Exceptional coding
- ✓Massive language support
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
DeepSeek Coder V2 Limitations
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Specialized for code
Best Use Cases
StarCoder 2
Code generationIDE integrationCode completionMulti-language
DeepSeek Coder V2
Code generationCode completionDebuggingCode translation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose StarCoder 2 if you need massive language support and prioritize good performance.
Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you need exceptional coding and prioritize massive language support.